Almost certainly not Johnny Depp.|
Below are 50 journal entries, after skipping by the 50 most recent ones recorded in
The Weasel King's LiveJournal:
[ << Previous 50 -- Next 50 >> ]
[ << Previous 50 -- Next 50 >> ]
|Wednesday, April 27th, 2016|
|Tuesday, April 26th, 2016|
|Monday, April 25th, 2016|
| Oklahoma: Abortion may be legal, but doctors who perform one will lose their medical licenses.
As for why they're wasting money setting their desperately-poor State up for another expensive lawsuit loss by passing blatantly unconstitional legislation, well, let's just ask a supporter:
"If we take care of morality,” bill supporter David Brumbaugh, a Republican, said during deliberations, "God will take care of the economy. Duh, I eat poop."
|Friday, April 22nd, 2016|
| And no, neither of the last two articles are "guess the state", despite both being Florida. Because they're not funny or weird or even absurd.
|Thursday, April 21st, 2016|
|Wednesday, April 20th, 2016|
| Harriet Tubman to be on the American $20 bill.
This is awesome!
Of course, there's a cynical part of me that says "oh, of COURSE they're letting a black woman in, now that many people don't use cash", and another cynical part that says "sticking the woman who 'stole' herself and a great many other people on a symbol of capitalist commerce is certainly an odd look" - but the cynical parts can have their say and I'll still be happy about HARRIET FRIGGING TUBMAN replacing Andrew Jackson.
|Tuesday, April 19th, 2016|
|Monday, April 18th, 2016|
|Amusing thing about Ontario laws.
So, something that makes me laugh. torrain is learning to drive and has a G1 license - an Ontario "learner's permit". This means that she can drive subject to certain restrictions: She must have an experienced, licensed, sober driver in the front passenger seat, she must avoid 400-series highways, she must have a BAC of zero, she must not drive after midnight and before 5am, etc.
Here's the catch: The definition of "sober" for the front passenger is BAC of 0.05 or less. BAC of 0.08 is the legal limit for drivers to actually, y'know drive.
So if we go out to dinner, she can drive us. If I have a beer or two with dinner, she can drive us home. But, assuming dinner takes a little longer than an hour, if I have *three* drinks with dinner, she cannot legally drive us home: by the law, if *I* drink too much, I *must* take over and drive, even if she hasn't had any alcohol at all.
This makes me laugh.
: It almost goes without saying that this would be a stupid thing to do and I do not do it. But it amuses the crap out of me that if I *were* to do this stupid thing, I would be legally required to drive instead of the more sober person.
|Friday, April 15th, 2016|
|Thursday, April 14th, 2016|
|It's rollover day!
Now entering our 12th year of broadcasting, with 18,523 posts, 119,462 comments received, 36,030 commments posted.
|Wednesday, April 13th, 2016|
|Stupid goddamn samba problems.
So for reasons that truly escape me, network file shares for Windows users are shared via a CentOS machine running Samba instead of directly off the NetApp via CIFS.
Anyway. It's working, except there's a thing: By default (and currently), samba logs are separated by machine - they log to /var/log/samba/%m.log which means there's one log for each laptop or desktop.
It would be handier to have the logs separated by user, or by service. The docs all say to just change that %m to %u for User or %S for Service... but if I do that, I get files LITERALLY CALLED /var/log/samba/%u.log or %S.log. It doesn't expand the user or service and give me per-user or per-service logs the way the docs and mailing list RTFMers say it will, it throws them all in a single file with a literal percent sign in it.
Anyone run into this and remember the magic spell to fix it?
CentOS 5.11, Samba 3.0.33.
: "Legacy, changing would require resources, changing would require users to do something different" oh wait I guess the reasons don't escape me but OH FUCK OFF.
|Fun with style guides.
In this case, the Reuters style guide requiring that all mentions of "the queen" be replaced with "Queen Elizabeth".
|Sunday, April 10th, 2016|
|Friday, April 8th, 2016|
|Thursday, April 7th, 2016|
|Tuesday, April 5th, 2016|
| "A near-epiphany at the Supreme Court" - the US Supreme Court rules that requiring a rich person to use a public defender is a violation of their right to effective counsel.
They don't, however, extend this to the natural and inevitable conclusion that requiring *anyone* to use a public defender in the USA must also be a violation of their right to effective counsel.
(Not that I blame public defenders - they do the best they can under impossible conditions. There needs to be at least ten times as many of them, though, likely far, far more. Or the USA could stop putting so many people into the courts, that would work, too.)
|Sunday, April 3rd, 2016|
|Friday, April 1st, 2016|
|Thursday, March 31st, 2016|
|Wednesday, March 30th, 2016|
|Tuesday, March 29th, 2016|
|Today's awesome computer trick.
Finding a glitch that lets you write arbitrary memory to a stock SNES, using a stock SNES controller, while playing Super Mario World: Awesome.
Using that code injection to write and then play Flappy Bird?
|Monday, March 28th, 2016|
|Friday, March 25th, 2016|
| I kind of love the #cruzsexscandal hashtag on twitter for the sheer number of misogynist Trump supporters on it who are all "I might have been skeptical about ONE accuser but there's THREE". And if you look back 24 hours, they're all "Jian Ghomeshi is innocent!". Look back two months, they're all "Bill Cosby is innocent!"
Trump supporters: they hate women, and support Trump because Trump also hates women. They will rationalise ANYTHING.
|Tuesday, March 22nd, 2016|
|SFF things that are sure as fuck *not* getting my votes:
Things #1: "The Shannara Chronicles" is most definitely NOT going on my Hugo noms next year, and it's going below No Award on the final if other people's taste is Doctor-Who-level horrible and it gets nominated.
I had high hopes. TV miniseries doing an adaptation of "The Good Terry Brooks Novel" by Terry Brooks! Starring John Rhys Davies and Manu Bennett! And, uh. Um. Well....
Remember that scene you loved, the one you thought was exciting and awesome when you were a small child and read Elfstones? Remember those characters you though were awesome, the epic battles in the desperate defense against the army of demons? The suspense, heroism, the high drama?
Got all those clearly in your head? Yeah, none of them are in the TV show. They've all been replaced with high school subplots. Involving, in one episode, a LITERAL HIGH SCHOOL. Where one of the characters finds a bunch of old D&D dice. They spend a whole episode on the LITERAL high school and about 5 minutes on the D&D dice, but leave out the entire demon army until 15 minutes from the end of the series. Worse, remember how Elfstones was the book that broke with being a Tolkien pastiche and tried to be something more? Well, Chronicles Of Shannara is not that. It's fanfic on the Peter Jackson Hobbit movies, and as bad as they were compared to LotR? That's how bad Chronicles is compared to them.
Everything that was good or fun in the book is gone. The actors playing Wil, Amberle, and Eritrea do their best but the best of them is Amberle and she's, like, "good for MTV", not good. Manu Bennett has less to work with than he did in Spartacus and John Rhys Davies chews all the scenery but he's got a small part, so it's really not enough.
And then there's the pacing. Let me put it this way: I'm 95% sure JJ Abrams was an uncredited script consultant, because *wow* it's bad. It's Star Trek Into Darkness bad. It takes weeks to ride south to find the bloodfire but then one day to ride back, and on that day it's sunset for the whole time *and* then still sunset for several hours after they arrive. From the Elven city to the spot where the demon army comes through is At The Speed Of Plot which would be fine except it keeps taking DIFFERENT amounts of time. The main source of suspense in the book is whether or not the small party of
Hobbits heroes can get the One Ring seed of the Ellcrys to Mount Doom the Bloodfire before the demon army fights through the combined forces of Good Guys and kills the Ellcrys, releasing them forever. Except, in the TV show? The demon army doesn't move, and the Elves make no attempt to stop them. It takes until after the Bloodfire is found for the demons to even *begin* to move towards Arborlon, and that's actually okay because the Elves set their very first line of defense *inside* the city, inside the Ellcrys' garden itself, like 30 meters from the tree.
And, I mean, then there's just the DUMB. Our
Hobbits heroes fall into the LITERAL HIGH SCHOOL to have some more tweenager drama, and explain away the prom decorations and shit as "a pocket of the old world, preserved undisturbed for thousands of years". Not TWO SECONDS LATER there's a flood of bats leaving this mysteriously guano-less "perfectly sealed" "perfectly preserved" high school gymnasium. Because it occured to nobody that maybe there shouldn't be bats there.
It was just bad.
Thing #2: Sheila Gilbert.
I finished books 3 and 4 of that, and yeah, everything I said about the constantly-jarring lousy editing, worldbuilding mistakes, inconsistencies from sentence to sentence let alone scene to scene or book to book? It continues, constantly. It even gets worse, as Jim Hines makes an understandable-but-critical mistake when pulling from one of 2014's Hugo nominated novels because he clearly hasn't read it.... and nobody checks. Nobody caught his error. He hinges *his entire overarching series-long plot* on a detail that, if you've *read* the book he's pulling from, doesn't work that way. At all. It's like he used a Wikipedia summary, and his editor clearly didn't even ask.
They're still entertaining novels but they're facepalmingly-badly-EDITED novels, with constant failures of internal consistency. And I know Jim Hines thinks Sheila Gilbert did a great job and is nominating her himself, but no. If those 4 books are examples of her work, she's *not* "Best Editor". There are a great many editors where I have no idea if they're good or not, because I can't see their work. When I'm looking in the right place I *can* see Sheila Gilbert's work, and it apparently sucks.
|Monday, March 21st, 2016|
|Friday, March 18th, 2016|
|Tuesday, March 15th, 2016|
|Monday, March 14th, 2016|