Almost certainly not Johnny Depp.|
Below are the 50 most recent journal entries recorded in
The Weasel King's LiveJournal:
[ << Previous 50 ]
[ << Previous 50 ]
|Friday, August 26th, 2016|
|This makes SO MUCH SENSE.
MORPHEUS: For the longest time, I wouldn't believe it. But then I saw the fields with my own eyes, watched them liquefy the dead so they could be fed intravenously to the living -
NEO (politely): Excuse me, please.
MORPHEUS: Yes, Neo?
NEO: I've kept quiet for as long as I could, but I feel a certain need to speak up at this point. The human body is the most inefficient source of energy you could possibly imagine. The efficiency of a power plant at converting thermal energy into electricity decreases as you run the turbines at lower temperatures. If you had any sort of food humans could eat, it would be more efficient to burn it in a furnace than feed it to humans. And now you're telling me that their food is the bodies of the dead, fed to the living? Haven't you ever heard of the laws of thermodynamics?
MORPHEUS: Where did you hear about the laws of thermodynamics, Neo?
NEO: Anyone who's made it past one science class in high school ought to know about the laws of thermodynamics!
MORPHEUS: Where did you go to high school, Neo?
NEO: ...in the Matrix.
MORPHEUS: The machines tell elegant lies.
NEO (in a small voice): Could I please have a real physics textbook?
MORPHEUS: There is no such thing, Neo. The universe doesn't run on math.
- from here, right at the bottom.
|Wednesday, August 24th, 2016|
|Tuesday, August 23rd, 2016|
|A terrifying thought.
Donald Trump is *not* the most racist, least coherent, and stupidest Republican running for office in the USA this year.
Aulani Kaaihue is the Republican candidate for Hawaii's 2nd Congressional District, and she is.... confused, at best. In all-caps. Very Christian. And boy howdy does she hate herself some Japanese people.
Bonus, if you scroll down you'll see that about 1/4 of her posts are about her boyfriend Howard Kim, who is running as a Democrat in Hawaii's 1st District on a platform of, I shit you not "Elect me because I do not have cancer". Because the previous holder of the seat, Mark Takai, died of cancer last month.
Notably, Mr Kim was *not* chosen by the Democratic Party as their candidate in the election - he lost to Colleen Hanabusa and will not be appearing on the ballot at all. Ms Kaaihue *was* chosen by the Republican Party as the person they most wanted to represent them.
Also notably: The entire turnout for the Republican primary in her district was approximately 16% of the turnout for the Democratic candidate alone.
Ms Kaaihue has been denounced by the Republican Party Of Hawaii, who apparently now deeply regret choosing her as their spokesperson and representative.
: although that hasn't stopped his, uh, "campaign" to win the byelection to finish out the last of Mark Takai's term. Again, I want to point out, on a campaign of "Vote For Me, I Do Not Have Cancer Like That Last Guy Did"
|Sunday, August 21st, 2016|
|Saturday, August 20th, 2016|
The Tragically Hip are a garbage band that is only famous because of CanCon laws. When Gordon Downey's brain cancer was revealed, the tragedy was "The Tragically Hip will continue to perform", not "their singer is dying". In a just universe ruled by a loving god, the opposite would be true: Gordon Downey would live a happy life in obscurity with nobody ever hearing him "sing", and The Tragically Hip would never have performed any shows, ever.
|Friday, August 19th, 2016|
|Wednesday, August 17th, 2016|
> vol destroy vol0
Are you sure you want to destroy volume 'vol0'? y
Volume 'vol0' destroyed."
(I had a very good reason for doing that. )
|Tuesday, August 16th, 2016|
|Friday, August 12th, 2016|
|Wednesday, August 10th, 2016|
|A brief Windows 10 PSA.
If you've gotten the "anniversary update" of Windows 10, you have probably already noticed that it wasn't just an "update", it was a clean install of a new copy of the OS and then an import of your settings and profile. Which means annoying things like the default MS apps (Edge, Explorer, Store) are re-pinned to start menu, the crappy MS programs for music and things have reset their defaults, your privacy settings have been eBayed unless you were careful during the update, etc.
All that's fine. It's annoying, but not actively harmful.
Actively harmful: The option to "notify me when a restart is required to install updates" has been REMOVED. Now there's no setting in the Windows Update options to avoid automatic reboots when it "thinks" you aren't using your computer, and you can only specify a 12 hour window of "never reboot during this time"
The good news is, there's a solution to that, hiding in Local Group Policy (Win10 Pro) or the Registry (Win10 Home).
If you've got Win10 Pro:
1) click start, type "gpedit.msc", press enter. Make the window fullscreen, you will need the room.
2) On the left, navigate to Computer Configuration -> Administrative Templates -> Windows Components -> Windows Update.
3) On the right, locate "No auto-restart with logged-on users for scheduled automatic updates installations" and double-click it.
4) Change the radio button from "not configured" to "enabled". Click OK.
5) Close the Local Group Policy Editor window.
Now, the machine will no longer reboot as long as a user is logged in. If all the users are logged out, it'll still reboot automatically but that's generally much less of a problem.
(OPTIONAL: in that same location from Step 2, choose "Configure Automatic Updates", click Enabled, choose option 3. This reverts to the Win7 default behaviour of "notify me before installing updates", which is good for updates that require a reboot to install and BAD for updates that don't require a reboot. If you set this option, you need to watch for update notifications and deal with them in a timely manner. You can't afford to ignore them.)
If you've got Win10 Home: Fucked if I know, it's in the registry somewhere. I'm 100% sure it's there, and I'm also 100% sure I don't know where it is. I'll go digging to see if I can find the setting, later, and I'll update this post if I do.
EDIT: It *looks like* the right solution for Win10 home is: Start -> "regedit" -> Enter. Navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\WindowsUpdate
If there's an "AU" subkey, click on it. If there isn't, right-click on "WindowsUpdate", choose "new->key" and name it AU. Inside AU, right-click and choose "New->DWORD Value", name it "AUOptions" and set its value to "3". Close regedit and reboot. This is the same as that step marked OPTIONAL up above for Pro users - if there's a registry equivalent to "No auto-restart with logged-on users" I haven't found it, but this should also get around the problem.
|Tuesday, August 9th, 2016|
|Saturday, August 6th, 2016|
|A slice of life with TV:
(In a serious scene about the lifethreatening side effects of misusing a brain stimulator)
TV character #1: "I must also point out, that device is not intended to be used in that manner."
TV character #2: "That's what she said."
torrain: [spews her drink]
|Tuesday, August 2nd, 2016|
|Monday, August 1st, 2016|
|John watches movies!
So I got two sets of free tickets to see movies recently, and so I saw Star Trek: Beyond and Ghostbusters, in the theatre, for free.
And I have opinions!
Beyond: Holy shit! I wasn't going to go see this movie, even free. I only wound up attending because 1) free and 2) someone else wanted to go who couldn't use my free tickets unless I went too. And: I did not immediately want to demand my money back. (no really, for a Star Trek movie that's HUGE). As it turns out: removing JJ Abrams and installing Justin Lin and Simon Pegg is not only a many-thousand-times improvement across the board, but results in a movie that's ACTUALLY WORTH SEEING.
But yeah. ST: Beyond is the fourth Star Trek movie *ever* worth seeing a second time. It avoids 99% of the Abrams innumeracy (a clear sign that Abrams was prohibited from touching the script), has actual character elements, has a reasonable conflict between the heroes and the villains, and is a perfectly Justin Lin movie: Lots of moderately-sensible action sequences, lots of FUN action sequences, moments of character interspersed in the action sequences, and builds to a decent finale. My main complaints are THAT IS NOT A FUCKING NEBULA and there wasn't quite enough clarity on the nature of the enemy. Still, given that it's a sequel to a movie where a CRITICAL PLOT POINT is that HUMANS ON EARTH CANNOT SEE THE MOON, those are miniscule.
Ghostbusters: Uh. I think this needed one more script pass. I hate dumping on it because of the hypermisogynist babymen screaming about it, but: I thought it was good, but needed work. First: There's a whole lot of "jokes" that aren't jokes, they're just the punchlines to jokes from the original movie. As in, multiple times where there was a funny sequence in the original? Instead of duplicating or or riffing off it, this movie just gives the punchline without the setup. That's a REFERENCE, not a joke, people, and references aren't inherently funny. Second, the film appeared to have no coherent idea of how ghosts work. Okay, the proton packs control ghosts and let you move them around, good. Then they discover they need a trap, okay, good. Now it's time for the big problem, aaaaaaaaand... now proton packs and all the rest *kill* ghosts outright instead of holding them. Why? Nobody knows. The dude causing all the problems has Phenomenal Cosmic Powers to control the bodies and minds of anyone in line of sight.... and then he doesn't. No explanation, nothing. All the ghosts are people until suddenly they're... the ghosts of a Macy's Parade that wasn't murdered all at once because whatever. All the ghosts are ghosts of normal people who died except for the three-story-tall ghost of a giant man?
And, I mean, they built up Kevin's eye/ear confusion MULTIPLE TIMES. He rubs his eyes when he can't hear you. There's a loud gong and he grabs his eyes going "OMG that's LOUD!". And then he shows the team his audition photos, saying "what makes me look more like a doctor? Shirtless Chris Hemsworth PLAYING the saxophone or Shirtless Chris Hemsworth LISTENING TO the Saxophone".... and he's holding the sax to his ear, not his eyes. That's *the payoff* to the joke you've been building for three scenes, and you flubbed it?
And let's not forget that at the climax of the film, the ultimate fix to the entire ghost problem happens BECAUSE THE GHOSTS DROVE ECTO-1 TO THE PLOT POINT AT THE RIGHT TIME. They didn't think of that! They didn't work for that! That was a win because of a pure accident! That's just bad writing.
The pacing was weird, there were a bunch of references where there should have been jokes, there were a number of missed opportunities for jokes that had clearly been set up and then abandoned, and the solution to the main problem was presented WAY too much as pure coincidence, not something the characters did or earned. Dammit, these are competent Esoteric Scientists(tm), they should not be reliant on stupid luck causing THE VILLAINS to bring the solution to the problem to them. This was a chance for them to do things, to come up with a solution and work to bring it about! Having the villains just solve the problem for them felt cheap.
Anyway. I want to see the director's cut of this movie, where the credits "villain makes cops and military dance" sequence is restored , and the Ghostbusters find a solution to protect themselves from it. I'm interested in the director's cut where they do something to ATTRACT the ghosts and retrieve ECTO-1 at the critical moment. I'm interested in the sequel, where they presumably won't make all these mistakes a second time. But for the movie itself, I have to say "I got in for free and I got my money's worth, no more."
Also, the product placement was obvious and gross: Stopping mid-scene, staring at the camera, and extolling the virtues of Pringles? People living in downtown New York ordering *PAPA JOHN'S*? Ugh. People, you do not need their money that much.
: Argument that "JJ Abrams is a zero" and thus multiplying him also results in a zero are accepted and then discarded, because Abrams doesn't just make awful movies. Abrams takes films that COULD be good, and ruins them. He is not a zero, he is a 0.001. You can, with enough effort, fix Abramsisms and make an Abrams film "less awful than most Abrams products" (Spielberg and Super 8) or "reasonably good as long as you ignore Abrams' desperate attempts to ruin it" (Lawrence Kasdan, Disney, and Star Wars: The Force Awakens)
: Wrath Of Khan, Undiscovered Country, and Galaxy Quest.
: Galaxy Quest not only IS TOO a Star Trek movie, it is the best Star Trek movie ever AND the best Star Trek movie POSSIBLE.
|Friday, July 29th, 2016|
|A brief PSA
Today is the last day to get Windows 10 for free.
If you don't want Windows 10, those annoying "hey you can upgrade now!" popups will finally vanish. If you do want Windows 10 (and I prefer it to 7 and consider it a complete no-brainer to upgrade from 8) you have another 15 hours or so.
|Monday, July 25th, 2016|
10 years ago today, I started my own business.
That client is no longer in business, and it would still be another month and a half before I would pick up a second client (still going!) and quit my OTHER job at My Beloved Corporate Masters to do this full time, but 10 years ago today was day 1 with client 1.
Not too shabby.
|Wednesday, July 20th, 2016|
For the second year in a row, neo-Nazis have abused a loophole to put garbage onto the Hugo ballot, displacing nominees that were actually voted for by people who genuinely thought they were good. This year, though, instead of JUST a stream of bigoted effluvia, they've also included a handful of nominees that were good and had buzz as maybe getting onto the ballot legitimately on their own.
So I'm doing something slightly different than my rules for last year - instead of No Awarding all the neo-Nazi picks, I'm comparing them to the worst of my own picks. If something dropped onto the ballot by the white supremacist vandals is good enough that I would have considered nominating it myself had I seen it during the nomination period, it goes above No Award.
Same as last year, I'm doing breakdowns with my thoughts.
( this is pretty longCollapse )
( EDIT: Oh yeah, there"s the retro-Hugos too.Collapse )
If you've made it all the way to here, have The Hugo Post Kitty.
|Saturday, July 16th, 2016|
| Just saw someone complaining that Hillary Clinton is "too liberal". And that drives me crazy because, uh, Americans? Hillary Clinton is *not liberal, in any way, at all*. Hillary Clinton is a hard-right extremist, of the sort that would be considered either "the far right of the rightmost Major Party" or "unelectably far right, relegated to an insignificant joke party" EVERYWHERE IN THE CIVILISED WORLD. Fucking hell, Bernie Sanders is center-right when you look at actual positions and not just "where you are relative to the bigoted extremists".
Clinton could MAYBE get elected in Canada or England, but she's significantly to the right of Theresa May or Stephen Harper or Boris Johnson - she might be an MP, elected by a yokel constituency of a few thousand xenophobic hicks in the middle of nowhere, like Nigel Farage or Jason Kenney, but she'd never be Prime Minister.
The USA is a captured two-party system with a hard-right extreme-conservative corporatist party - the Democrats - and also a second ultra-bigoted theocratic party, of the sort that polls 1-2% in civilised places, the Republicans. There's no such thing as an American politician who's "too liberal" because there's no such thing as a liberal American politician, all liberals are excluded before the process starts. Anyone who says an American politician is "too liberal" just means "insufficiently extremist right-wing for my personal ultra-extremist bigotry"
At the same time, the person ignorantly calling Clinton "too liberal" was doing so in the context of "She's too liberal but Trump is a disaster, so I will vote for the liberal evil" and, uh, okay. Sure. Whatever. Clinton's a right-wing extremist who will be significantly worse than any liberal candidate would be, but you're correct, Trump would be WAY worse. So you do you and hold your nose and vote Clinton, even though she's "too liberal" by being an ultra-right-wing lunatic who is not liberal in any way.
|Thursday, July 14th, 2016|
|Friday, July 8th, 2016|
|Thursday, July 7th, 2016|
|Monday, June 27th, 2016|
|Sunday, June 26th, 2016|
|Friday, June 24th, 2016|
|Wednesday, June 22nd, 2016|
| Hey, remember the user responsible for this incident, and this one?
I've got another one. We've got a bunch of a certain kind of desktop case, where the sides go on vertically without screws, then the top of the case slides in horizontally to lock them in place and you close *that* with screws. I'm looking at an unrelated computer and I notice the top piece, which is a rectangular piece of reasonably sturdy flat metal, is missing. So I ask the user where it is, and he said "Oh, $Engineer borrowed it a few months back. It's just part of the case so I figured I didn't really need it."
($Engineer being, of course, the user responsible for the two incidents up top.)
I go and ask him why he borrowed A PIECE OF A COMPUTER CASE and where it is, and can I please get it back.
His answer: "Oh, yeah, that's in my car. I can bring it in any time."
Okay, but WHY does he have it in his car? To my eternal regret, I asked him.
"Well, you remember all that snow we had? I needed a shovel."
|Tuesday, June 21st, 2016|
|Monday, June 20th, 2016|
| People are being SO MEAN to Anton Yelchin now that he's dead.
|Friday, June 17th, 2016|
|Thursday, June 16th, 2016|
|Wednesday, June 15th, 2016|
|Gotta love American politics.
The USA, where a "moderate" Republican can speak at an extremist hate group's rally and call for Obama's death, and claim he was "just joking"
Bonus points: His official spokesperson clarified that OF COURSE when Senator Perdue says
"Let his days be few; and let another take his office.that NATURALLY isn't praying for death and destruction, no, no, not at all. She then added "we should add the media to our prayer list".
Let his children be fatherless, and his wife a widow.
Let his children be continually vagabonds, and beg: let them seek their bread also out of their desolate places.
Let the extortioner catch all that he hath; and let the strangers spoil his labour.
Let there be none to extend mercy unto him: neither let there be any to favour his fatherless children.
Let his posterity be cut off; and in the generation following let their name be blotted out.
Let the iniquity of his fathers be remembered with the LORD; and let not the sin of his mother be blotted out.
Let them be before the LORD continually, that he may cut off the memory of them from the earth."
The threats are barely even dogwhistling, at the moment.
|There's a thing I'm seeing.
(cw: domestic abuse and the Orlando masssacre)
I keep seeing people calling for the ex-wife of the Orlando shooter to be charged as an accessory because she knew he'd talked about killing all those people and tried to convince him not to do it, but didn't call the cops.
That's..... so not good. Not good at all. Should she have done something different? MAYBE - but there's a critical point here I want to address.
You're asking the abused ex-wife, of a violent, armed man, who has committed no crime yet, to call the cops on him?
You know what's going to happen, right? They're going to show up and talk to him, maybe bring him into the station, maybe hold him for a few hours, and then they're going to release him. Because he's committed no crime, yet, and he's got a job in law enforcement, and he's presumably smart enough to deny or downplay her claims. And then, this armed, violent man, with a history of violence against his ex-wife, where she's his ex because he abused her? He's going to go over to her house to "address" why it was she called the cops on him.
And then she's going to die.
And she's going to die without knowing if he was ever REALLY serious about his ranting murder plans.
Other possibilities: The FLORIDA police show up and, having been informed that a non-white man is armed and dangerous, kill him in front of her, because these are AMERICAN POLICE. And she's not white, either - they'll likely kill her, too. Again, without her knowing if he's actually making plans or just making disturbing threats.
The only way "she calls the cops" works out is if he repeats his threats to the police, while in custody. And that's the LEAST likely result, damn near impossible, requires that he basically *try* to go to jail. The most likely result is "he's released, and she's dead", the next is "both he and she die", possible is "the police ignore it and do nothing". To actually stop the massacre by calling the cops on him requires pigs to fly.
Should she have done it anyway, given hindsight? Well, sure, I think had she known then what she knows now, she probably should have, and then fled for her life to avoid him when the police released him, secure in the knowledge that he's going to be arrested or dead in days. But that's hindsight. I *understand* why she didn't, and I'm deeply fucking uncomfortable with the idea of charging one of this man's victims with his crimes, because as a WoC she didn't trust American cops and didn't want his abuse to escalate against her.
EDIT: I'm leaving the original as-written, but it's been pointed out to me that I misunderstood. The abused ex-wife is NOT the woman being questioned and possibly charged, that's his current wife. Still, take what I wrote above and substitute "a woman who knows he's armed, making homicidal statements, and that his previous wife divorced him because he abused her" for "a direct victim of abuse, that we know of" and my larger point still stands.
|Tuesday, June 14th, 2016|
|Monday, June 13th, 2016|
|Thursday, June 9th, 2016|